A Scientific Definition of Good VS Evil
Ratifying Science with Religion
We are seeing the very negative effects of the use of extracted energy on everything, and we instinctively know this is not good, and in fact is mathematically and physically unsustainable.
On analysing the systemic problems, we see some problems in the standard scientific definition of energy, in that it is too vague, only part of the truth, which opens it up to abuse by the profit driven system, in a way which is almost invisible to us, when we are still of a mind that we each of us have to profit to survive.
Science itself seems afflicted with this problem, which stems back to the “Enlightnment”, when effectively, science appears to have diverged from religion, becoming almost a religion in its own right, but invisible to most, is the driver of profit throughout.
Intrinsically, profit is associated with extracted energy. The ability to profit depends on having to hand something which can be made unobtainable to other parties who have to submit labor, in absence of anything else, in return for the thing made scarce.
This is also the essence of debt, bankruptcy, and slavery.
Most fundamentally, the thing made scarce, is energy.
Now we are experiencing existential threats arising from the side effects of the profit driven extracted energy mode of business, we are tracing through the system of all things connected, and finding some fundamental errors of truth, including the missing sign from the fundamental scientific definition of energy, we have to face the whole truth, that religion in general appears to have known about this all along about this very deep fundamental flaw that frankly, we have had to evolve to understand.
So we should accept that there really were intelligences in the past that rivalled, and probably far surpassed our current level of intelligence.
Modern science has a problem with this, because in order to be able to profit from information, scientists, and in fact creators of all kinds, have to be able to sell their information as original, using the concept of intellectual property.
Now, seeing how all of this links with religion, we have to admit that there is truth in it, and yet no proof which is accepted by profit driven science.
I put it that there is proof, if we are versed in the tools and techniques of Systems Engineering, which ironically are a product of the profit driven system.
The proof is in the form of the System Solution which is mathematical, expressed in the specialised languages of Systems Engineering and modelling, adding up to give the final solution with 100% certainty, rather like a jigsaw. If we have the skills needed to recognise all the pieces, it is a simple matter to see how they all fit together, and the finished jigsaw absolutely can’t be disputed.
Now we might see that there is a kind of revolution and war happening, but it is not the obvious war happening in Ukraine, that is only a symptom of the main problem, which is that we don’t fundamentally understand how energy, and creation, and destruction works, what they actually mean in terms of energy.
Energy from solar creates everything we know, all of life. This is obvious if we understand the system, or if we are religious, or spiritual.
But if we are driven only by science consciously, and unconsciously by profit, then we can’t see this very simple truth. Folk affected fire blunderbuses of unrelated information, to try distract from the truth, that they themselves do not want to see.
That is the effect, of being hooked on using negative energy, but we don’t even know it, because we’ve never signed the energy, and signing it sounds religious, because…. well, it is.
Yes, it is religious, we have to admit it.
We also have to admit, we are at the biblical definition of the end times. This is the actual battle between good and evil, those who support the forces of negative energy, and those who don’t, knowing that we have to go with positive energy, or perish as a species.
There are deeper implications on the origins of humanity, associated with this, which become apparent when we look at things like Geo-Engineering, which in the end is a truly cosmic undertaking, my own opinion of that is that it is intrinsically evil, endangerging all possibilities of moving to positive energy, as we are doing, though economists and thus governments don’t seem to have got their heads around it yet, they will, because this inevitable, the only way of enabling humanity to mature to a species truly worthy of being custodians working to enrich our planet, and us, growing like a plant, from infancy to adulthood after forming our first leaves, as we are doing, by way of our solar farms now appearing all over our planet.
By nature, that energy is distributed, so the only way it can be had in a way that benefits all of humanity, is to allow it to grow amongst the population, as we have been doing.
But now we can see the economic effects of the missing sign in economy, we are starting to see that the issue of free money representing this energy has to be done, is inevitable, but this will destroy the profit driven business world, as it was. It too has to transform to something done by volunteers for love, rather than as folk reluctantly working to pay off debts, doing things they might hate doing, outputting poor quality whilst at the same time struggling to survive.
There is a mindset that says it is somehow bad, to allow folk to become dependent on free money, but really, why not, if it is forever sustainable, unlike the system of modern slavery?
I don’t think religion has any problem adapting to this concept of negative and positive energy representing good and evil, it is science that has the problem, and science that is responsible for the missing sign.
So science has to attack this problem of its misunderstanding about religion head-on, and admit that it was a mistake to discount religion as just hocus-pocus that got in the way of making profit.
Science has to admit that the use of extracted energy is the fundamental evil being done, the thing that will end humanity by throwing us all into a living hell, in only a few years if not less, as we see the exponential hyperobject of human misery multiplying. No-one can predict how quickly, or how exactly existantial misery will ensue, all we know with certainty is that it has to happen, because that is the thing in which we have mathematical certainty.
So we have to change to positive energy, and to do that, we have to admit that there is a war going on, between good and bad energy, and until that is realised and understood by science, we are supporting the forces of evil as a species, and therefore will suffer the consequences, if we do not change to positive energy, the force of good.
“Renewable Energy” becomes nonsensical terminology of the old profit driven, negative energy world, when we realise this. This is an example of the blunderbus of misinformation which is fired every time that term is mentioned, confusing which energy is good, and which energy is bad.
Extracted energy is bad, use of it is truly evil, because the Joules from it result in a net loss of Joules put to use on Earth by nature. This an actual definition of destruction. That makes it something that subtracts, and therefore is mathematically negative, the sign indicating with no confusion that this is what it does, it subtracts from Earth.
Positive energy is donated from the sun, with no labor of extraction associated. Only the Joules from the sun can be used to create anything on Earth, nature is doing it continuously. When we undo what nature does, then we are destroying, but when we copy what nature does, even doing it more efficiently in many ways, then we create, that is we add joules creatively put to use on Earth. To be able to do this, we have to obtain the Joules from somewhere not on Earth, that is the sun.
Therefore only the energy of the sun is positive, and only it can be used to do the positive work of creation, that we have to do now to undo the damage done so far by doing all things using extracted energy.
It wasn’t evil before we knew about this, it was probably something necessary.
But is absolutely evil now we know, to be continuing to do this evil, of living by destruction, when we have the choice, to go with the positive energy of the sun
Science has to take that on, embracing it completely, to show that it itself can be reformed, to work in a positive energy future.
Then maybe economists. who advise governments and banks, will finally start to admit this also, the only way to a non-hellish future, is to stop practicing the evil we are doing by using the negative energy, and to start doing real good by using the only source of positive energy.