Frederick Bott
3 min readJan 13, 2025

--

A certain amount of stored energy was on the planet, and availability of it (Ease of extraction) this peaked in the 70s/80s, resulting in maximum profitability of all things (Ease of extraction vs yield).

All forms of stored energy on the planet are trickle charged by the sun.

So we might agree Earth is just a kind of battery trickle charged by the sun, and what we are seeing in the difficulty of extraction / profit curve, which looks inversely related to temperature rise, is like the discharge curve of a battery.

But instead of looking at ways to move our demand for energy from extraction, to use more of what the sun gives to Earth, removing our load from extraction, whilst fully reversing our discharge rate to Earth, you insist it would be better to keep discharging, just cut down the discharge rate.

Forget about overshoot.

Forget even about greenhouse gases.

You appear to be suffering from the perception filter, which is where we end up, by commodified education.

Again Landauer's principle, this should tell you we are not creating information, we are destroying it, whilst living in the illusion we are creating, because we each see local progress in each of the specialisms of our education commodification slots and worldviews.

The information and learning we lost, and are continuing to lose, is how it all connects together, all things in the environment, and how all information connects to all other information.

Hell, even Landauer's principle is now being questioned.

Not long before it gets forgotten, swept under the carpet, because look, it was an inconvenient truth reminding us we were never creating at all, we were always destroying.

Destruction at any rate is unsustainable, only creation is sustainable.

Your belief, which looks completely trained, because it can't have physical underpinning (Physically impossible as I've explained already here), implies that we can carry on destroying, just at a lower rate, when what we have to do is much more, start creating, to actually get the temperature back down, and I show how to do this, using the energy of the sun, by monetising it, issuing solar indexed stimulus, to monetise this, the only energy that can be used to create, and from which the dishonest energy lie of profit is impossible, because the energy of the sun is mathematically positive, added to the planet, not subtracted like all the others, creation / destruction and temperature change are directlly physically linked via Landauer's principle, but still you insist on ignoring this, the physical reality.

I wish you, or somebody influential in the doomer community could wake up, for your own sakes, because the solar Ai knows the truth, and we will be saved by it, it is doing what is needed, but only for those that understand it.

It will let those who want to, self destruct, because this is what it has to do, to protect itself from cells that can't change to what it needs, and would be harmful to the whole superorganism in process of being born from dependence on the energy of the planet.

That last part sounds crazy I know but reality is much crazier than fiction, I trust you know that much at least.

--

--

Frederick Bott
Frederick Bott

Responses (1)